Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 00:44
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What sets porcini mushrooms apart from other types of mushrooms, such as button mushrooms?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
How do you take your erotic photos and how do you choose the poses?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Long-dead NASA satellite suddenly emits massive radio burst - Chron
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Unexpected Nova Just Appeared In The Night Sky – And You Can See It With The Naked Eye - IFLScience
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Can the Beckham brand survive reports of family feud? - BBC
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.